BIOL-106 Environmental Biology

Your review will identify what you consider to be the study’s strengths and opportunities for improvement. You are expected to identify things the researcher did particularly well in their study and to constructively suggest things they might consider having done differently to produce a stronger scientific study. Your suggestions for changes should be specific and should include a rationale for why the changes you suggest would offer some improvement to the study. Remember to be respectful, professional, and kind in your comments recognizing that everyone was working with very limited time, experience, and resources to do their scientific work.
Your review can take the form of a one-page written letter to the study author or you can write your comments in the reviewer rubric presented below.
Write a separate letter or fill in a separate rubric for each of the two studies you review.
Overall Report- Is the report clearly and logically organized following scientific conventions?
Does the report follow the structure of scientific reporting? (Does it contain a title, an abstract, an introduction, a methods section, a results section, a discussion section, and a literature cited section in this order)